![]() ![]() Portfolio/Penguin, New YorkĪdner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Harv Bus Rev 84(4):98 Retrieved from ://WOS:000236250500023Īdner R (2012) The wide lens : a new strategy for innovation. Scarecrow Press, LanhamĪdner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Finally, we found key factors that may be the cross-fertilization link between the two communities that represent each theory.Īckerson LG (2007) Literature search strategies for interdisciplinary research : a sourcebook for scientists and engineers. Another finding, which has not been mentioned in previous research on the topic, is that the construction of the initial concepts of the IE theory was originally rooted in several SI elements. A similarity was found showing that these two different theories are applications of System Thinking approach. The results of this analysis show that both theories involve the assessment of three key aspects: the understanding of innovation activities, the role of the agents involved, and the interaction and resulting networks among them. Using a framework, this paper explores the elements belonging to each theory’s domain, in order to identify the key factors necessary to compare the two theories. ![]() We performed a critical literature review of both topics using meta-synthesis as method to identify, analyze and compare the two theories. This paper aims to clarify to what extent the emerging theory of innovation ecosystems (IE) and the theory of systems of innovation (SI) are complementary and then identify how its communities could benefit from cross-fertilization. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |